@article {991, title = {HYDI-DSI revisited: constrained non-parametric EAP imaging without q-space re-gridding}, journal = {Medical Image Analysis}, volume = {84}, year = {2023}, month = {02/2023}, chapter = {102728}, abstract = {

Hybrid Diffusion Imaging (HYDI) was one of the first attempts to use multi-shell samplings of the q-space to infer diffusion properties beyond Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) or High Angular ResolutionDiffusion Imaging (HARDI). HYDI was intended as a flexible protocol embedding both DTI (for lower b-values) and HARDI (for higher b-values) processing, as well as Diffusion Spectrum Imaging (DSI) when the entire data set was exploited. In the latter case, the spherical sampling of the q-space is re-gridded by interpolation to a Cartesian lattice whose extent covers the range of acquired b-values, hence being acquisition-dependent. The Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) is afterwards used to compute the corresponding Cartesian sampling of the Ensemble Average Propagator (EAP) in an entirely non-parametric way. From this lattice, diffusion markers such as the Return To Origin Probability (RTOP) or the Mean Squared Displacement (MSD) can be numerically estimated.
We aim at re-formulating this scheme by means of a Fourier Transform encoding matrix that eliminates the need for q-space re-gridding at the same time it preserves the non-parametric nature of HYDI-DSI. The encoding matrix is adaptively designed at each voxel according to the underlying DTI approximation, so that an optimal sampling of the EAP can be pursued without being conditioned by the particular acquisition protocol. The estimation of the EAP is afterwards carried out as a regularized Quadratic Programming (QP) problem, which allows to impose positivity constraints that cannot be trivially embedded within the conventional HYDI-DSI. We demonstrate that the definition of the encoding matrix in the adaptive space allows to analytically (as opposed to numerically) compute several popular descriptors of diffusion with the unique source of error being the cropping of high frequency harmonics in the Fourier analysis of the attenuation signal. They include not only RTOP and MSD, but also Return to Axis/Plane Probabilities (RTAP/RTPP), which are defined in terms of specific spatial directions and are not available with the former HYDI-DSI. We report extensive experiments that suggest the benefits of our proposal in terms of accuracy, robustness and computational efficiency, especially when only standard, non-dedicated q-space samplings are available.

}, keywords = {Diffusion Spectrum Imaging, Ensemble Average Propagator, Hybrid Diffusion Imaging, diffusion MRI}, doi = {102728}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361841522003565}, author = {Antonio Trist{\'a}n-Vega and Tomasz Pieciak and Guillem Par{\'\i}s and Justino R. Rodr{\'\i}guez-Galv{\'a}n and Santiago Aja-Fern{\'a}ndez} } @article {995, title = {Validation of deep learning techniques for quality augmentation in diffusion MRI for clinical studies}, journal = {NeuroImage: Clinical}, volume = {39}, year = {2023}, pages = {103483}, abstract = {

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of deep learning (DL) techniques in improving the quality of diffusion MRI (dMRI) data in clinical applications. The study aims to determine whether the use of artificial intelligence (AI) methods in medical images may result in the loss of critical clinical information and/or the appearance of false information. To assess this, the focus was on the angular resolution of dMRI and a clinical trial was conducted on migraine, specifically between episodic and chronic migraine patients. The number of gradient directions had an impact on white matter analysis results, with statistically significant differences between groups being drastically reduced when using 21 gradient directions instead of the original 61. Fourteen teams from different institutions were tasked to use DL to enhance three diffusion metrics (FA, AD and MD) calculated from data acquired with 21 gradient directions and a b-value of 1000 s/mm2. The goal was to produce results that were comparable to those calculated from 61 gradient directions. The results were evaluated using both standard image quality metrics and Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) to compare episodic and chronic migraine patients. The study results suggest that while most DL techniques improved the ability to detect statistical differences between groups, they also led to an increase in false positive. The results showed that there was a constant growth rate of false positives linearly proportional to the new true positives, which highlights the risk of generalization of AI-based tasks when assessing diverse clinical cohorts and training using data from a single group. The methods also showed divergent performance when replicating the original distribution of the data and some exhibited significant bias. In conclusion, extreme caution should be exercised when using AI methods for harmonization or synthesis in clinical studies when processing heterogeneous data in clinical studies, as important information may be altered, even when global metrics such as structural similarity or peak signal-to-noise ratio appear to suggest otherwise.

}, keywords = {Angular resolution, Artificial Intelligence, Deep learning, Diffusion tensor, diffusion MRI, machine learning}, issn = {2213-1582}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103483}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158223001742}, author = {Santiago Aja-Fern{\'a}ndez and Carmen Mart{\'\i}n-Mart{\'\i}n and {\'A}lvaro Planchuelo-G{\'o}mez and Abrar Faiyaz and Md Nasir Uddin and Giovanni Schifitto and Abhishek Tiwari and Saurabh J. Shigwan and Rajeev Kumar Singh and Tianshu Zheng and Zuozhen Cao and Dan Wu and Stefano B. Blumberg and Snigdha Sen and Tobias Goodwin-Allcock and Paddy J. Slator and Mehmet Yigit Avci and Zihan Li and Berkin Bilgic and Qiyuan Tian and Xinyi Wang and Zihao Tang and Mariano Cabezas and Amelie Rauland and Dorit Merhof and Renata Manzano Maria and Vin{\'\i}cius Paran{\'\i}ba Campos and Tales Santini and Marcelo Andrade da Costa Vieira and SeyyedKazem HashemizadehKolowri and Edward DiBella and Chenxu Peng and Zhimin Shen and Zan Chen and Irfan Ullah and Merry Mani and Hesam Abdolmotalleby and Samuel Eckstrom and Steven H. Baete and Patryk Filipiak and Tanxin Dong and Qiuyun Fan and Rodrigo de Luis-Garc{\'\i}a and Antonio Trist{\'a}n-Vega and Tomasz Pieciak} }